1. The Defendant’s KRW 13,220,650 as well as 5% per annum from June 7, 2017 to September 6, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

1. Project approval and public announcement of the particulars of adjudication - Project name: B road packing work (hereinafter referred to as the "project of this case"): The defendant - Public announcement of the Gyeonggi-do on February 17, 2012

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on April 13, 2017 (hereinafter “instant ruling of expropriation”) and the ruling of objection on December 21, 2017 (hereinafter “instant ruling”): The starting date of expropriation: June 6, 2017 - Land subject to expropriation and compensation for expropriation: The object of expropriation (hereinafter “instant land”) and obstacles listed in the attached Table attached to the Plaintiff’s ownership (hereinafter “instant obstacles”) (hereinafter “instant land”), respectively, - An appraisal corporation for expropriation: A tax appraisal corporation, a central appraisal corporation, a Pacific appraisal corporation, a Pacific appraisal corporation, a stock corporation - a compensation for losses: The same shall apply to each column of “compensation for expropriation” listed in the attached Table attached to the Plaintiff’s ownership.

C. The appraiser E’s appraisal result (hereinafter “court appraiser”) - The appraisal result: The appraisal result is as indicated in the “court appraisal amount” in the annexed sheet on compensation for losses for the land and obstacles in this case: The comparison standard area: F in the acceptable city (specific use area: natural green area, land category: land site, and land use status: land size: land size: 365,000,000 won/land size as the officially announced price as of January 1, 201 as of January 1, 2012, which is the public announcement of project approval; hereinafter “the comparative standard area”) and calculated the gap between the land in this case and the land in this case by comparing and analyzing the differences between local factors, individual factors, and other factors.

- Compensation example: It is recognized that it is located in the comparative standard place and its neighboring area, or a similar area within the same right, and that there is a high possibility of comparison in individual characteristics such as restrictions on public law and utilization status, etc., and that the development gains from the public service in question are not reflected.