1. The Defendant’s KRW 49,754,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from January 13, 2018 to March 19, 2019.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public announcement - Project name: B development project (urban planning facility project): Defendant - A public announcement of project approval (public announcement of approval of implementation plan): Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on December 1, 2016;

(b) Decision on expropriation made on November 24, 2017 by the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Metropolitan City: - All obstacles (hereinafter “in this case’s obstacles”) to D-482 square meters in Seongbuk-gu Seoul (hereinafter “instant land”) and above ground buildings, etc. owned by the Plaintiff - The instant obstacles: 90,021,000 won: January 12, 2018; - An appraisal evaluation corporation E-A-Appraisal and an appraisal evaluation corporation F-Comparison standard area: The comparison standard area of the instant land: The Seongbuk-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Forest Land Management Corporation [the use of detached houses, special-purpose areas, road traffic: n.e., n., n.s., n.s.)] shall be selected.

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s objection made on September 20, 2018 - The instant obstacles: 1,494,200,000 won: The instant obstacles: 91,749,000 won; - The appraisal corporation: the LA and the LA: The LA: The LA and LA: The LA - The LA - The LA - The LA - The comparison standard land: all the above two appraisal corporations shall be a comparative standard land of the instant land in order to select [the current use: a detached house: a special use area: a natural green area; a natural green area; a road traffic tax rate: a shape/land tax rate: a : a stalthy / sloping): the fact that there is no dispute on the selection [the grounds for recognition]; the entries in

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The amount of compensation for the objection against the instant land and obstacles owned by the Plaintiff cannot be deemed a legitimate amount of compensation. Thus, the Plaintiff seeking additional compensation for the difference between a reasonable amount of compensation according to the court’s appraisal result and the amount of compensation for the objection.

The plaintiff's assertion that in the procedure of the adjudication of acceptance and objection, compensation for the business, which had been mutually named "J" on the ground of the land of this case, should be granted.