The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. C as a representative director of E (hereinafter “E”) and an internal director of F (hereinafter “F”) of F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”), a person in charge of the overall management of the company, such as business explanation, investment attraction, and investment management, while carrying out the pawning franchise business with the brand called “H” (hereinafter “F”), is a person in charge of the affairs such as business explanation, investment attraction, and management of investment funds. D is a person in charge of C, investment attraction, investment management, and branch management, and the Defendant was a spouse of C and divorced with C around 2019.

B. C and D conspired to attract investors by explaining the business as if they secure principal and high-profit profit when making an investment in the head office through the nationwide pawning franchise business advertisement. E and F did not have any profit-making business investment or profit-making business profit-making business, and they continued to receive new investment funds while managing subordinated investors’ investment funds in the manner of “comprehing,” which pays high-rate profits and dividends to senior investors, and even though they did not have any intent or ability to return the principal, they received investment funds from many victims, including the Plaintiff, etc., and received them through fraud, fraud, violation of the Act on the Regulation on the Prevention of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), fraud, and Unauthorized Receipt, etc., and received imprisonment with prison labor from the first instance court on January 25, 2019 (limited to Seoul High Court Decision 2015Da29719, Jun. 25, 2019). However, the appeal was filed by the Seoul High Court and the Seoul High Court (Seoul High Court Decision 2010).