logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.04.10 2018고단85
출입국관리법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

around September 2016, A proposed to Defendant B that “I will give three million won a monthly wage if I want to recruit and manage women of Russia to work at a entertainment establishment,” and Defendant B consented to this, thereby soliciting the Defendants to operate a entertainment center by employing Russia women.

From October 2016, the Defendants operated the entertainment shop F on the seventh floor of the E-site E building, and when light control was conducted on April 28, 2017, the Defendants again operated the entertainment shop H on the sixth floor of the G building in the esisic City from May 2017.

1. A violation of restrictions on employment of foreigners;

A. Defendant B in collusion with Defendant B, from October 2016 to April 2017, 2017, employed nine foreign women who had no status of stay to work as shown in the attached Table 1 to 9-1, including the employment of Russia Women I (one person J) without the status of stay to work in E’s entertainment week F on the seventh floor of the E building in e.g., in collusion with Defendant B., who had no status of stay to work as described in the attached Table 1 to 9-1.

B. From June 21, 2017 to June 22, 2017, the Defendants conspired to employ 37 foreign women who did not have the status of stay to work as indicated in the attached Table 9-2 to 45, including employment of the Russian Women K (one name L) with no status of stay to work at H on the sixth floor of the entertainment week in the esic City of G building, from around 21, 2017 to June 2, 2017.

2. False invitation;

A. Defendant B prepared a false invitation letter stating that “The above women shall invite them to Korea as a high-fluor, and apply for a visit visa with an opportunity for Korean tourism only for a long time.” Defendant B issued the Defendant’s certificate of personal seal impression and resident registration card to N on October 14, 2016, and invited N to apply for a visa at the State-fluorore hall, thereby inducing N to apply for a visa in an unjust manner.

B. Defendants.

arrow