logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.01.26 2016고정1311
출입국관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall employ a person who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities in the Republic of Korea.

1. Joint crimes committed by Defendant A and C jointly operated the “E” entertainment shop located in Daejeon Pungdong-gu, and, around May 2016, in collusion, Defendant A and C employed five foreigners who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment in the Republic of Korea from the said entertainment shop as an entertainment service provider at the said entertainment shop around May 2016, as indicated in the list of crimes as follows:

F Russia 3 May 2016, G Russia 4 May 5, 2016, G Russia 5 Jussia 5 May 2016, 2016, May 5, 2016

2. The sole criminal defendant is a person who operates the “L” entertainment shop located in K at the Gangwon-si, Gangwon-si, and around May 2015, the defendant employed the Ma of the Russian nationality, who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment in the Republic of Korea, as the above entertainment service provider’s entertainment service provider.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the third public trial date);

1. Materials attached to a protocol (1357 pages of evidence) concerning the suspect interrogation of the police against the accused;

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C by the prosecution;

1. Some statements made by the prosecution against N orO in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect of the police against P;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer against F, G, H, I, and J;

1. Investigation report (to apply the investigation report (the details of the crackdown on entertainment points in Daejeon and the reasons for the entry of suspects, etc.);

1. Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the relevant Act and Articles 18 (3) of the Immigration Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the Immigration Control Act, and Article 18 (3) of the Immigration Control Act, the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

arrow