1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. All of the plaintiff's claims expanded in the trial is dismissed.

3...

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 2010, the Plaintiff became aware of the Defendant C, the operator of the Internet site “E” (hereinafter “instant site”) mediating marriage with Vietnam women.

B. On November 16, 2010, the Plaintiff started from Vietnam on the basis of the guidance of Defendant C at the end of consultation with Vietnam women and Defendant C on the premise of international marriage. On the same day, the Plaintiff met the Defendant B, who left the airport of Vietnam on the same day.

C. The Plaintiff and Defendant B drafted A’s evidence No. 1 on November 17, 2010, and the main contents are as follows.

1) A(Defendant B) vicariously executes all matters related to the marriage with Vietnamese women, and B pays USD 4,500 to B. 2) A(Defendant B) provides double lines to B up to twice.

(Additional Sheet 3) The new father shall not engage in a disguised marriage or fraudulent marriage, and if the new father intentionally leaves the Republic of Korea within two months after entry into Korea, the married life is changed to a wave, A shall be reappointed only once (Provided, That in the case of a re-chartered ship, USD 3,500 shall be assessed against Eul, and the refund shall not be made in the case of the waiver of the re-chartered ship by Eul.

(4) A party who has breached this contract shall be liable for USD 2,000 to the other party.

On November 17, 2010, the Plaintiff prepared the above evidence No. 1, and paid USD 4,500 to Defendant B, and thereafter paid USD 200 in addition to the new package travel expense.

E. On November 18, 2010, the Plaintiff, by the brokerage of Defendant B, filed a marriage report with F, a female of Vietnam’s nationality, with F, who returned home on his own on November 23, 2010, and filed a marriage report with F in accordance with Defendant C’s guidance.

F. After that, on January 17, 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) on January 17, 201, the Plaintiff, Vietnam, as Vietnam, completed the process of signing a clerical error in Korea; (b) returned to Korea on January 24, 201; and (c) on March 22, 2011, the Plaintiff entered Korea.

G. F. The Plaintiff.