logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.10.25 2017고단548
아동복지법위반(아동학대)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is in office as a teacher of the C Child Care Center D D.

The Defendant, at around 14:00 on July 12, 2016, at C Child Care Center D in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 14:0, when the Victim F (5 years old), when the Victim G, H (5 years old), I (5 years old), J (5 years old), K (5 years old), L (5 years old), M (4 years old), N (5 years old), N (5 years old), P (5 years old), Q (5 years old), R (5 years old), R (5 years old), R (5 years old), S (5 years old), S (5 years old), S (5 years old), S (5 years old), S (5 years old), S (4 years old), T (5 years old), and 5 years old (5 years old), caused the Victim to develop the child’s mental health and health by causing harm to the victim, excluding the child’s child abuse and the child’s mental abuse.

Summary of Evidence

1. The results of the CD reproduction of CCTV records or video recording records made by the victim;

1. Images of a CCTV image by capturing it;

1. Child Q-related voice recording files and the results of CD reproduction in the pertinent year [Defendant Appellants repeatedly, even if the victimized person took care of the same half-years by the Defendant and took care of the same half-years, and let the victimized person do so to the victim, who is financial resources in the same half-years as the victimized person;

The author argues that it is only requested to speak, and that they did not instruct the victim, etc. to do so, and that the above children do not have to do so when the victim, etc. was injured.

However, in full view of the facts recognized by the above evidence, such as the fact that the statements of Q, a child at the victim and the above site, are considerably specific and consistent, and that there was a fluorial back of the victim after the victim's birth, and that it is difficult to obtain easy understanding that the victim was seriously injured on the ground that the victim took care from his birth, and that the victim confirmed that the Defendant returned to the same place with the victim's mind while living together, etc., the above criminal facts are sufficiently recognized.)

arrow