logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.11.12 2015고단2797
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant causing property damage: from around 00:15 on September 1, 2015 to around 01:20 on the same day, at the DNA conference operated by the victim C in Suwon-si from around 00:15 to around 01:20 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim to open a night-to-face visit from the workplace E, a worker, but refused to do so; (b) the Defendant: (c) caused the damage to a fire-fighting machine in the corridor, which was in the victim’s possession; and (d) destroyed the repair cost to approximately KRW 90,00,000; and (d) caused the damage by removing two shocked networks equivalent to KRW 95,00, the market price of the victim’s possession installed at the said televis.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) destroyed the property at the time, time, and place described in paragraph (1); (b) obstructed the victim C’s maternal business by force by preventing customers from entering the telecom by avoiding disturbance, such as wrapping up the telecom, etc. on the telecom, from entering the telecom.

3. On September 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received a report at the place indicated in paragraph (1) around 01:20 on September 1, 2015; (b) 112, stating that “a male guest satisf in a DNA conference,” and sent to the scene, the light-satisf, G, who was dispatched to the scene, arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender with suspicion of interference with the performance of his/her duties; and (c) expressed his/her desire to have the Defendant satfe at the patrol vehicle; and (d) assaulted the face of the said G one time with the right knee.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to crime prevention, suppression and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning C and G;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

3. Article 70 of the Criminal Act for the Detention of Labor House Head.

arrow