logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2019.11.21 2019고단3150
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person running a city bus B.

Around 19:08 on October 16, 2017, the Defendant was stopped and started to get passengers to get off at the bus stops in front of the bus stops located in the Gangseo-gu, Ansan-si, the Seoul apartment at Ansan-si.

In such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle has the duty of care to prevent the loss of passengers on the bus by safely starting it after checking whether the passenger was safely lowered or not, and taking necessary measures such as closing the door accurately.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and did not confirm whether or not the passengers were completely deprived of it, and caused the victim D (the age of 81) who was lowered from the bus above the road.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as minculization of mincization on the left-hand side, which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A written appraisal;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of accident images);

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) and (10) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. All the circumstances, including: (a) the degree of injury to a victim on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; (b) the Defendant’s negligence was not written; (c) the Defendant was committed before and once the same offense was committed against the Defendant; (d) the Defendant was admitted to the mutual aid association; (e) the victim’s bereaved family members entered into an agreement with the victim; and (e) the fact that

arrow