Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, as a result of the victim D(16 3), was hedging with female friendlys, and the appraisal is not good. A around February 2, 2015, around 04:00, around 04:00, the victim D was in front of the two middle schools in the Asan-si, Iam the victim D. Defendant B was in front of the victim D on the ground that the victim D was prevented from being accompanied by the defendant A on his day, and the victim D was in front of the two middle schools. Defendant B was in front of the victim D on the ground that he was accompanied by the defendant A and the victim D was prevented from being able to walk once. Defendant A was prevented from driving the victim D.

The Defendants continued to move the victim E (18) and the victim F (18) to a studio parking lot where the names of the victim E (18) and the victim F (18) are unknown, and the victim was shot up to the shot, and the Defendant B saw the victims to be shot up to 5 am.

As a result, the Defendants shared the victim D's 14-day medical treatment, and each of them committed the 14-day anti-inwards that require the victim E to provide treatment, and the victim F to each of the 14-day anti-inwards that require treatment between approximately 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F, and D;

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes described in each injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 2(2) and (1)3 of the former Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Amended by Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016); Article 2(1)3 of the Criminal Act; Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (elective of fines)

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 and Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant A was guilty of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and Defendant B merely inflicted an injury on the victims by himself, and there was no fact of assaulting the victims or ordering Defendant B to assault the victims. Thus, the victims were jointly shared.