[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 2526]

1. On December 2013, the Defendant: (a) removed, in combination with E, one ethyl ethyl typing (mix with a drainage method) owned by the victim of the damage, which was installed as a drainage channel at the F Gunside in Sejong-si, the lower court, around 23:0 to 24:00 on the lower end date; and (b) loaded the G cargo vehicle owned by the Defendant A in his/her hand; and (c) cut off.

2. On January 201, 2014, between 23:00 to 24:00, Defendant A’s thief, who was installed on the road front of the closed factory in Sejong-si, the lower court rejected 60,000 won of the market price of the victim Sejong-si, which was owned by the joint signature of the victim Sejong-si, and three lids with the lower part of the lower part of 4.550,00 won of the market price (tentative name) by breaking up, and loaded the said cargo onto loaded.

3. The Defendants’ special larceny and attempted special larceny combined with each other, and during the period from February 2, 2014 to February 23:00 to 24:00, the following year: (a) the Defendants: (b) removed ethyl methyl 10 in the market value equivalent to 600,000 won in the face value, which is the joint signature of the victim Sejong City, installed on the drainage route of the I salary ambalam farm in Sejong-si; and (c) removed ethyl 10,000 won in his/her hand and loaded the said cargo onto

3. By up to 27. A total of 12 times in the same manner as in the list of crimes in the annexed sheet, 12 times in total 10,353,300 won was stolen or attempted.

[2015 Highest 1600]

1. Defendant B did not obtain a driver’s license in violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving);

Defendant

B A around April 18, 2015, from the front day of Sejong-si W, to the front day of the Jeju Black and pigs cafeteria 653 in the same area, Jcoon car was operated.

2. No motor vehicle owner who has violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any motor vehicle which has not been covered by mandatory insurance;

Defendant

B operated a motor vehicle which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and place as in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

[2014 Highest 2526]

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements 1.