The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Punishment of the crime

On June 5, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months in Busan District Court’s Dong Branch, which was sentenced to imprisonment for fraud, etc. on June 5, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 27, 2014. On November 29, 2013, the judgment was finalized on January 23, 2014, which was sentenced to imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Busan District Court’s Dong Branch, and one year of suspension of the execution of six months imprisonment for perjury at the Busan District Court’s Busan District Court’s Dong Branch’s District Court’s decision was final and conclusive on March 21, 2014.

1. On September 2012, the Defendant: (a) found one driver’s license lost by the victim D from the tables on numbers number omitted near Suwon-gu, Busan SPC; and (b) on September 1, 2012, the Defendant: (c) obtained one copy of the driver’s license.

The defendant did not follow necessary procedures such as returning the driver's license that he acquired as above to the victim and did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. On September 17, 2012, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s home, made G, a mobile phone agent in Busan Suwon-gu, enter “D” in the name column, “H” in the resident registration number column and address column, and entered the name of “D” in the signature column, using a tample, in two pages of the mobile phone subscription application form.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising rights and duties, forged two copies of the application for the mobile phone subscription in the name of D, which is a private document on the rights and duties, and had the above mobile phone agency G, who is aware of the forgery, keep two copies of the application for the forgery in the agency as if they were duly formed.

B. On September 21, 2012, the Defendant: (a) forged a copy of a mobile phone entry application in the name of D, which is a private document on the rights and obligations, for the purpose of exercising the right and obligations at the location described in the paragraph (a); and (b) completed one copy of a forged mobile phone entry application by G employees of the said mobile phone agency who are aware of the forgery.