1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the Defendant to purchase KRW 400,00,000 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) from the Defendant and the subordinate city C, 113 Dong 1304 (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

B. On June 2, 2015, the Plaintiff paid the full amount of the purchase price, and thereafter, took over the apartment of this case from the Defendant, and walked with the paper and paper plates already constructed for the purpose of mooring and printing. On the floor and on the wall of the apartment of this case, the Plaintiff discovered any defect due to the difference between the water leakage and the pipe not confirmed at the time of the conclusion of the instant sales contract (hereinafter “instant defect”).

C. On April 2015, the time when the Defendant resided in the apartment of this case (see attached Form 1) the apartment of this case, the water leakage of the air conditioning valves in the main household occurred, and the water leakage of the air conditioning valves in the main body of the heating pipe was introduced from the main body of the air conditioning valve to the lower part of the heating pipe, thereby spreading to the living room, the bedroom 2, and the bedroom 4 floor. 2) The external inflow water was moved to the lower part of the bedroom 1,00, the settling room, the 3 left side of the bedroom, and the part of the balcony expansion of the balcony 4 balcony, and the air conditioning room was moved to the lower part of the balcony 1,00,000, and it was affected the wall surface and the floor contamination.

3) On the wall of the apartment of this case, the height of the new strings and the main strings were polluted by a strings, and the water flowed from the main strings together with the internal strings that occurred between the strings and the strings, and the hrings were laid down on the strings. D. The plaintiff was entrusted with the interior construction of the apartment of this case to the construction business operator of the trade name of “D”, and paid KRW 47,00,000 to the above construction business operator at the cost of construction. [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 2 through 4, Gap evidence 7, Gap evidence 8 (including a string number)

the appraisal results of each entry or image of the appraiser E;