1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, a juristic person conducting interior construction business, etc., concluded a contract for construction with respect to the inside part of the apartment construction project, which was executed by the Jinjin Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D 250-household apartment construction”), among the new construction project for the apartment construction project, and carried out the construction project.

The defendant is a corporation that engages in the development, manufacture, and sales of products related to tinboard.

B. On September 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) supplied the instant apartment site to Nonparty 1, a company selling same-sexs; and (b) executed the instant apartment site construction after being supplied with the general stone site by Nonparty 2; (c) certain parts of the instant stone site were produced by the Defendant; and (d) Co-Defendant 1, Ltd., Co-Defendant 2, Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co-Defendant 1”) supplied the building site sales company (hereinafter “the instant stone site”).

C. Since September 21, 2015, Jinjin Construction: (a) confirmed that water purification has occurred on the part of the instant YD constructed to the Plaintiff about the extent that the instant YD had been constructed (inception of the surface of the YD); (b) and (c) known the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff known the Plaintiff of the foregoing defects.

Accordingly, on September 23, 2015, B, an employee of the wallsan, visited the site to verify the above defects. D.

B At the time of on-site visit, after ascertaining the fact that there was a defect in on-site by the Plaintiff and the staff of on-site construction, he sent the phone call to C, who is a quality manager of the Defendant, to the effect that there is a defect in on-site, and let C communicate with the staff of on-site construction.

After completion of the currency with C, the staff of the said friendly Construction Co., Ltd. prepared a written confirmation (No. 6, hereinafter referred to as the “instant confirmation”) stating the following:

The cause: The defendant's person responsible for the occurrence of error in the hort part of the paper landing at the upper end of the annual leave of absence shows some same phenomenon even in the case of the constructed product and the finished product not seen at the female.