A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 12, 2015, at around 12:30 on June 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) found while drunk in the D restaurant located in Busan Metropolitan City, and took a bath and reflect to the victim E, who is his/her employee, such as “this year and low-age”; and (b) expressed the victim E, “on the part of his/her employees, who brought Handphones in Handphones,” “I am you bring Handphones,” without good cause, the Defendant expressed to other customers, “I am this ice, Chewing gue,” and received the phone here.

“To the end of 13:30 on the same day, the victim’s restaurant business was interfered with by force by neglecting the disturbance failure for about one hour by 13:30 on the same day.

2. At around 13:40 on June 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was accompanied with the reporter as referred to in paragraph 1 within the Busan B District Office of the Busan B District Police Station G District located in F in Busan, the Defendant: (b) went to the site by another police officer to verify the reported fact; (c) upon receipt of a request from the Plaintiff, the Defendant “I will come to the site.” (d) “I will come to the seat of the Plaintiff,” and “I will take the hh h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h, h h h h h h h h h

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding support for handling reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and H:

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Crimes 1 (Interference with the Execution of Official Duties) on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution of official duties in the basic area (from June to one year and four months) (No person in special sentencing) of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds of the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties. The violation of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties is a type 1 (Interference with Duties).