Text
1. The defendant shall have jurisdiction over the plaintiff with respect to each land listed in the attached list 1, 2, and 3.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. According to the Land Survey Book drawn up during the Japanese Occupation Period, G is written as follows: B B B 1,806 (hereinafter “instant assessment land”); C 230 square meters (hereinafter “instant assessment land”); D 2,325 square meters (hereinafter “instant assessment land”); E 914 square meters (hereinafter “instant assessment land”); and F 1,492 square meters (hereinafter “instant assessment land”) before F 5 square meters (hereinafter “instant assessment land”).
B. Each of the instant circumstances land was divided, converted into a unit area, and changed of land category. The instant assessment land was one land listed in the annexed land list (hereinafter “instant land”). When individually named each of the lands listed in the annexed land list, the instant assessment land was classified into the instant two land, etc.; the instant assessment land was divided into the instant three land, etc.; the instant assessment land was divided into the instant land; the instant assessment land was the instant 4 land; the instant assessment land became the instant five land; and the instant assessment land became the instant five land.
C. As to the land of this case 1, 2, and 3, the Defendant completed the registration of initial ownership by the Jung-gu District Court’s annual District Court registry office No. 1008 of Jan. 30, 1996, and by the receipt No. 1084 of Jan. 30, 1996 as to the land of this case 4.
The land of this case 5 is unregistered and the registrant is not indicated in the land cadastre.
The plaintiff's assistance division G (G, the legal domicile of Gyeonggicheon-gun, H) was established with the head of South-Nam I, and I had K, the plaintiff in South-Nam, the plaintiff in South-Nam, and Samnam L.
I died on October 15, 1956 from Australia G, which was deceased on April 20, 194, and died on July 14, 1953 first of all, and on July 14, 1953, G.
As a result, the plaintiff, who is the son of I, succeeded to Australia due to the death of G.
[Ground] Evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. Determination as to the cause of the claim (1) Determination as to the identity of the Plaintiff’s counter-party and the title holder of the situation.