beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not different from the allegations made in the court of first instance, and there is no evidence additionally submitted in the court of first instance (the plaintiff asserted that it is necessary to consider H’s flow quantity at the time of the concentration of this case. The plaintiff attached Gap evidence No. 31 in the statement of grounds for appeal, but it was not separately adopted and examined as evidence by submitting it only as reference material for applying for appraisal of flow size of the above means of transport at the time of the oral argument. However, even if the plaintiff failed to pay appraisal fees after being unable to conduct appraisal, and even if the plaintiff additionally examined evidence submitted by the plaintiff as stated in the above statement of the repair statement, it is insufficient to reverse the judgment of the court of first instance.)
An abbreviationd name established in the judgment of the first instance is also used below the same.
[Supplementary or supplementary parts] Under the third sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "6:40" of the first sentence shall be deemed "06:40", and "7:10" shall be deemed "07:10", respectively.
Part 4 of the judgment of the first instance court, "Nos. 1, 2, 5, 7, 11, and 14" in Part 17 of the judgment of the first instance shall be written with "Nos. 1, 2, 5, 7, 11, and 14."
On the 7th page of the first instance judgment, the following items shall be added to the following items, and the 16th letter of "A-5" shall be added to "B-B-5".
Defendant B bears the burden of proof with regard to the fact that Defendant B did not neglect the re-transfer of the steel in the river site between K and Lridge and loaded on the front part of the bank, but Defendant B neglected the re-transfer of the steel on the H river site, thereby causing damage to the flood of this case.