logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.10.31 2014고단2171
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 19, 2014, at around 19:15, the Defendant received a report that the Defendant was satisfing on the street in front of the “Dju shop” located in the window C of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and received a removal from F and G of the “C police box” affiliated with the “Chobu Police Station E” sent by the Defendant.

The Defendant, under the influence of alcohol on the grounds that he was drinking, she saw that he was “this Chewing feas well,” and she saw that he was “the feas well-feasible feas, dead, and Chewing feas,” and her face was feashed twice by shouldering the chest part of F, and her face was feashed once as head.

Accordingly, the above police officers arrested the defendant as a flagrant offender and arrested the defendant as a flagrant offender, and f the chin of the head to board the patrol vehicle once again.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the law No. 1 to 5 of the evidence list submitted by the prosecutor

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act is a confession and reflect of the reason for sentencing, and the defendant was under significant alcohol at the time of committing the crime, there was no record of punishment for violent crimes since 1982, there was no record of criminal punishment since 2002, a total of two million won as the repayment of damage to police officers, and the sentencing criteria of the Sentencing Committee [Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties], and other consideration, etc.

arrow