Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 2812] Defendant B received an order from the injured party by ordering both the amount of KRW 210,000 in total and the amount of the market price to be paid as if the injured party did not have the intent or ability to pay the price to the injured party, in the case where the injured party’s operation of the injured party K, which is located in the Dong-gu, Dong-gu, U.S., Dong-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City of Gyeonggi-do on September 21, 2015.

As a result, Defendant B was delivered property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The K's statement;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment;

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendant A, who is the 2015 Highest 2416 Defendant, operated N Kindergartens, O child care centers, P child care centers, and worked as the head of a kindergarten, etc. for about 34 years, and Defendant B operated S, which is a food material supplier, for about 15 years, and is engaged in affairs related to the supply of children’s teaching materials and teaching equipment.

Based on the fact that the competent authority does not properly audit the details of the execution of meal expenses paid to childcare centers or kindergartens, the Defendants prepared a false statement of transactions in a manner more severe than the actual delivery of specifications of transactions related to meal service materials or unit prices, and made an application for payment such as accounting report and subsidies using the softened false statement of transactions. The difference between the actual amount of meal expenses and the actual amount of the subsidies was recruited by the Defendants in a street.

1) Child-care center subsidies and child-care center violating the Infant Care Act through the integrated child-care information system (the basic child care fees for those between the age of 0 and 2 and the age of 3 through 5).