The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact-finding, the Defendant did not instruct or take part in the F’s injury crime, and he did not voluntarily invest in the victim G based on business feasibility, and the Defendant did not guide the victim G to withdraw money under the pretext of investment by threatening the victim G.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which convicted all the charges of joint injury and conflict against the defendant is erroneous in the misconception of facts.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant asserted the same purport in the lower court’s judgment regarding the assertion of mistake of facts.

이에 대하여 원심은 공동상해 부분에 관하여는, F이 ‘2012. 11. 10. 피해자 C을 때려 상해를 가할 당시 피고인도 그 상해에 가담하여 넘어진 피해자가 일어나려 하자 피해자의 옆구리를 발로 걷어찼다’고 진술하는 점, 피해자 C은 ‘F에게 맞고 쓰러진 상태에서 다시 일어나려고 하는데 누가 옆구리를 발로 찼다’고 진술하여 폭행 부위 등에 관하여 F의 진술 내용과 일치하는 점, F은 수사기관에서 '당시 피고인이 혼자 책임지라는 말을 하였고 피고인이 보복을 하거나 경제적으로 도움을 줄 수 있는 사람이라 생각하여 피고인이 가담하지 않았다고 진술한 바 있다

Around March 2013, when F was investigated by the police, the Defendant was deemed to have credibility in the F’s above statement in light of the circumstances under which the Defendant paid F a sum of 6 million won under the pretext of using F as an agreed fee, etc., and the Defendant stated that he did not have observed the victim C at the time, but the victim C and F consistently stated that there was a defendant at the scene of the injury.