The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit after the appeal shall include parts resulting from the intervention.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 8, 2014, the Defendant entered into a contract under which the instant forest E (hereinafter “instant project”) is to carry out the F business for the potter-gun E forest (hereinafter “the instant forest”) from May 9, 2014 to December 4, 2014.

B. On July 14, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into an employment contract with the Defendant and invested in the work among the instant businesses.

(c)

On October 6, 2014, nine members, including the Plaintiff, entered the instant forest unit with the permission to enter the military unit into the barracks, and during the livering work, there was an accident where a part of the body, including the Plaintiff, died, and the rest of the body, including the Plaintiff, were injured (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(d)

In the instant accident site, there was an open mine with 16 lots of mines located within the scope of 300 square meters, centering on the site of the instant accident, but no boundary mark was installed at the instant accident site.

On the other hand, H and I, who was designated as a field agent, did not stay at the accident site of this case and did not provide safety education to the people.

E. After the instant accident, the Plaintiff was hospitalized at the J Hospital and the Chungcheongnambuk University Hospital Hospital and received outpatient medical treatment due to symptoms, such as depression, inorganic history, apprehension, beeas, early 14, 2015, early 14, 2015, the Plaintiff was hospitalized and outpatientd.

F. On March 20, 2018, the Plaintiff’s symptoms as of March 20, 2018, at the time of the first instance court’s entrustment of the mental and physical assessment of the K Hospital director (hereinafter “the instant appraisal entrustment”), presented an opinion that it is necessary to determine whether the Plaintiff’s symptoms constitute “the stress disorder,” and the Plaintiff’s treatment of the mental health department for the next one year ought to be additionally determined through re-evaluation.

Accordingly, this Court entrusted the plaintiff with the physical appraisal on August 24, 2020, but it added the plaintiff's physical appraisal.