logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.07.26 2013노1882
명예훼손
Text

The judgment of the first instance shall be reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. misunderstanding of the gist of the grounds for appeal and misunderstanding of legal principles (the contents posted by the defendant on the Gtel bulletin board, and the contents contained in the mail sent to the above officetel sectional owners are all acts for the interests of the above officetel sectional owners, and thus, is not unlawful). 2. Summary of the facts charged in this case

A. The Defendant, around July 5, 2012, using computers kept there at the D Co., Ltd. office located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City C 307, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-si, and prepared a printed article stating that “The F Co., Ltd. F, the temporary manager of which is the temporary manager, would cause confusion in the thickness of each sectional owner and occupants,” and on the same day, Jung-gu, Seoul.

1.2. The honor of the victim F was damaged by openly pointing out facts by posting each floor elevator on the front bulletin board of the officetel.

B. On July 16, 2012, the Defendant: (a) using computers kept in the management office located in the H 1st floor in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu; (b) “Manager” in the form of “A4; (b) Gtel

1.2. The qualification of the sectional owner of the building is also known.

G

1.2. It is not owned one square in the name of the whole FC, provided that it is not owned.

G 1 The Office of 1011 also leased

“Preparation of a document with the content of “G” by means of post

1. The two officetels sent it to the sectional owners, thereby impairing the victim F’s reputation by openly pointing out facts.

3. If an act that defames a person by openly pointing out a fact at the judgment of this Court is true and solely for the public interest, the person may not be punished under Article 310 of the Criminal Act.

Here, "the time when the alleged facts are related to the public interest" means that the alleged facts are related to the public interest when objectively viewed, and the perpetrator should also indicate the facts for the public interest subjectively.

arrow