The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around October 28, 2013, the summary of the facts charged against the Defendant: “Around October 28, 2013, at the third floor occupant representative conference room of the C apartment management unit of the C apartment complex, the Defendant informed of the distortion of the C apartment management unit; “DC (Nam) was punished in the past several criminal cases due to interference with business, damage to property, injury, etc. in our apartment complex for the past several years; and in multiple civil lawsuits, the Defendant lost all of them. Although the Defendant claimed part of the cost of lawsuit against the damages, it still remains suffering from damages, such as not paying the cost of lawsuit against the damages but paying other legal costs, and the Defendant was at the center of the division of the apartment unit, who was at the center of the C apartment group of the C apartment group of the C apartment group of the C apartment group of the C apartment group of the C apartment group of the C apartment group of the C apartment group of the C apartment group of the C apartment group of the C apartment group of the 2007 to 2008, 2019.”

2. The Defendant asserts that his act is not unlawful as it is for the public interest.

If a person’s act of damaging a person by openly pointing out a fact is true and solely for the public interest, it may not be punished pursuant to Article 310 of the Criminal Act. “When a person’s act is related to the public interest” refers to the public interest from an objective point of view of the alleged fact, and such fact should also be expressed subjectively for the public interest. However, it is widely related to the public interest of such a person, not only to the public interest of the State, society, and other general public, but also to a specific social group or group.