The Defendant’s KRW 77,705,472 to Plaintiff A, KRW 38,181,748 to Plaintiff B, and each of the said money from March 19, 2018 to September 20, 202.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) D is the EMW car (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 12:55 March 19, 2018.

(ii)A motor vehicle driving by driving a motor vehicle, while driving a two-lane and driving a one-lane of the four-lanes at a point of 176 km in the upper parallel line of the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff vehicle”) on the road of the F driver’s G (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff’s vehicle”) with a two-lane course while changing the two-lane course from the area of the Busan Special Metropolitan City.

) The left-hand part of the front-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle was shocked to the right-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle, which led to which the Plaintiff’s vehicle shocked the side-way protection wall (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) The Plaintiff A, who was on the back seat of the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident, sustained injuries, such as the mouth of the shoulder to the right shoulder, and the Plaintiff B, due to the outside of the right shoulder and the pelle, etc.

3) The Plaintiffs are the parents of F as husband and wife, and the Defendant is the insurer which has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant’s vehicle (based on recognition). [This ground] fact that there is no dispute, and evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 5 (including each number, hereinafter

each entry or video of this Court, the results of the physical examination commission to the head of the H hospital of this Court and the head of the I Hospital, the purport of the entire pleadings.

B. According to the above facts, the plaintiffs were injured by the operation of the defendant's vehicle, and the defendant, the insurer of the defendant's vehicle, is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident in this case.

C. Whether liability is limited or not, the Defendant asserts that the negligence of the Plaintiff’s driver without driving the concession of F, who is the Plaintiff’s parents, should also be considered for the Plaintiffs, who are their parents. Thus, the following circumstances, namely, it appears that the Defendant’s vehicle did not turn on the direction direction, etc. while changing the course, and the vehicle’s right side of the Defendant’s vehicle on the expressway driven by high speed.