The Defendant’s KRW 22,857,142, Plaintiff B, and C respectively, and each of the said money from March 21, 2019.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Fact 1) E means the F rocketing taxi (hereinafter “Defendant”) around 02:56 March 21, 2019, around 02:56

) A single accident (hereinafter referred to as “the first accident in this case”) occurred while driving a vehicle and driving a five-lane, one of the five-lanes of the 89-gil 49 Olympic Games, as the Seoul Gangnam-gu bankruptcy, into a ebscopic ebscopic ebscopic ebbscopic ebscop

2) On March 21, 2019, the network G (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) driven a three truck of H Poter (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) on March 21, 201, and driven a one-lane of the five-lanes as the said Olympic Games. On the other hand, in order to avoid the Defendant’s vehicle stopped near the first accident in the instant first accident, the network (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) shocked the back portion of the I driver’s J-Fighting bus, which moves along a two-lane course from the third to the second one in order to avoid the instant first accident while changing the two-lane course.

(3) The deceased died due to the second accident of this case, etc. (hereinafter “the second accident of this case”). The plaintiff is the spouse, the plaintiff B, and C of the deceased, and the defendant is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a mutual aid agreement with the defendant vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 17, Eul evidence 1 to 9 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) or video, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above findings of recognition of liability, the Defendant, the insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle, barring special circumstances, is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs, who are the inheritors of the Deceased and the Deceased, due to the second accident of this case.

In this regard, the defendant asserts that the second accident of this case occurred due to the former causes attributable to the deceased who was under the influence of alcohol, and thus, the defendant should be exempted from liability.

The main text of Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be used for the principal.