beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly and severally committed against the Plaintiff KRW 3,730,904,548 and Defendant A Co., Ltd. from August 21, 2017.
Reasons
Description of Claim
Attached Form
like description of the cause of action
(However, the obligee agreed to supply food materials to the Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “A”) around March 2015, taking into account the following: (a) the obligee is “Plaintiff”; (b) the obligor is “Defendant B Co., Ltd; (c) the obligor is “Defendant C”; and (d) the obligor is “Defendant D”; (c) the obligor is “Defendant D”; (d) the obligor is the obligor is “Defendant C”; and (e) the obligor is the obligor is the obligor is the obligor’s debt; and (e) the obligor is the obligor is the obligor’s debt; (e) the judgment of confession against the Defendant A Co., Ltd. (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act); and (e) the overall purport of the arguments and entries as to the judgment of the Defendant B, C, and D; (e) the Plaintiff’s supply of food materials to the Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “A”); and (e) the Plaintiff’s total supply of unpaid materials to the Plaintiff 16, 306, 16,56, and 40.
According to the above facts, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable with Defendant A to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of supply unpaid by Defendant A, KRW 3,730,904,548, and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from May 9, 2017 to the date of delivery of the duplicate of the application for the instant payment order to Defendant B. From May 2, 2017 to May 3, 2017, the record clearly shows that the duplicate of the application for the instant payment order is the next day after the delivery to Defendant C, while Defendant D is obligated to pay the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum as stipulated by the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from May 9, 2017 to the date of full payment.
In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.