beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant and the victim B (the 70-year-old age) met with the Section “C” located in Kimhae-si prior to about 20 years of age, or mutually known, and the Defendant did not seem to have suffered monetary damage from the victim, and thus, they did not have good reputation.
1. On May 23, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 21:00 on May 23, 2020, at the front corridor of the victim’s residence in Yangsan-si D apartment E; (b) sought the victim to think that the victim is not the defendant; (c) however, the victim would not open the door; and (d) caused the disturbance to the front door and the wall of the entrance door to the front door of the entrance door and the wall of the entrance door to the front door of the entrance door and the wall of the entrance door so that the victim would suffer from disturbance, and caused the damage of the victim’s property by using 160,000 won in repair expenses as incidental methods.
2. On May 24, 2020, the Defendant: (a) from around 09:40 to around 10:00 on May 24, 2020, around the victim’s residence, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s property by making it difficult to repair the victim’s entrance, fishing, glass hold (around 66,00 won at the market price), etc. as stated in paragraph (1), which is an object dangerous to the victim’s horse, on the ground that the victim does not listen to the Defendant’s horse; and (b) in the aforementioned D apartmentF parking lot, the Defendant cut off the victim’s front glass, window, and tamp part of the victim’s car so far as it is difficult to repair the victim’s goods by means of the number of auxiliary equipment equivalent to approximately KRW 2,348,938, repair cost.
3. On June 15, 2020, the Defendant committed a crime (special injury) on June 15, 2020, around 20:15, in the front corridor of the victim’s residence, the victim thought that he was not the Defendant, and the victim thought that he was not the Defendant, and that he did not look at the victim’s residence, and the victim did so, as described in paragraph 1, because he was sexual intercourse, he was called “psychopathy” on the entrance and wall.