A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operated the “J” as an advertising agency with K from July 2016 to January 2017, and the victim E (the age of 26) is a person who worked as an employee of the said company and acquires the said K’s shares around December 14, 2016.

1. Around December 13, 2016, the special assault Defendant used the Defendant’s residence located in Busanjin-gu, Busan, and used the Defendant’s Messenger, which was dangerous for the reason that the Defendant respondeded to the Defendant’s Messenger, to the instant Messenger, and used the Defendant’s ssenger, which is a dangerous object, for the following reasons: (a) at least 30 times the victim’s ambbbbbbbbs, ma, etc.; (b) from around that time to December 29, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim by carrying dangerous objects more than four times in total, such as the list of crimes, as indicated in the list of crimes.

2. Violence;

A. On December 28, 2016, the Defendant assaulted on three occasions the part of the victim on December 28, 2016, on December 28, 2016, on the grounds that the victimized person would not intend to make a share contract.

B. On December 31, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim on two occasions on December 31, 2016, on the ground that he/she was unable to properly perform the work that the Defendant was the Defendant’s residence located in the Busan Jin-gu, Busan, and on the ground that he/she was unable to properly perform the work that the Defendant got the Defendant, he/she used the victim’s knife at least 2-30 sons, and on the Internet line, used the victim’s knife on two occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by each prosecutor to E;

1. The Defendant and his/her defense counsel asserts that the recording (from December 6, 2016 to December 31, 2016) and the Messenger dialogue content (from November 27, 2016 to December 31, 2016) [the Defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that the Messenshe used at the time when the Defendant was the victim is not dangerous objects.

Whether certain goods constitute “hazardous goods” under Article 258-2(1) of the Criminal Act shall be determined by the other party or a third party when using the goods in light of social norms.