logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.01.19 2016고단5749
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal history] On March 19, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court (Seoul Western District Court) and was released on August 14, 2015 during the enforcement of the sentence in the Southern Southern District Court (Seoul Western District Court). The same year

9. 24. The parole period expired, and on October 26, 2016, the same court was sentenced to five months of imprisonment for an injury as a crime of injury, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 28th of the same month.

[Criminal facts]

1. On September 27, 2016, the Defendant was driving a vehicle with C low-speed typ, without a driver’s license, in the direction of about 5km from the road front of the city of Mapo-gu Seoul, to the intersection of the south of the river of about 120 square meters from the road front of the city of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, where the trade name near the new village of Mapo-gu, Seoul is unknown, at around 0.155% of alcohol while under the influence of alcohol at about 0.15%.

2. On September 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at around 01:10 on September 27, 2016, at the intersection of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, the Defendant: (b) had a mind that the Defendant was under the influence of drinking from the head of Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station D, the head of the police station affiliated with the Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, to be under the influence of criminal punishment; and (c) had the Defendant’s birth with the intent to avoid criminal punishment.

A. The Defendant, at the same time and place as above, informed E of the personal information of the F, signed “F” in the driver’s report prepared by the said E and the driver’s circumstantial report prepared by the State driver.

Accordingly, the defendant forged the driver's length report and the driver's length report, which is a private document to prove the fact for the purpose of uttering.

B. The Defendant, at the above time and place, submitted to the above E a written investigation report on the detection of the driver who was forged and the circumstantial report on the driver who was employed at the same time and at the same place, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. The principal driver;

arrow