logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.11.28 2016고단6983
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won, respectively.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On July 15, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2.5 million from the Incheon District Court to a fine of KRW 2.5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving), a summary order of KRW 2 million due to the same crime in the same court on July 23, 2008, and a summary order of KRW 4 million due to the same crime in the same court on June 5, 2013.

On July 17, 2016, at around 06:15, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at least 0.158%, operated a DM-W-car under the influence of alcohol level 0.158%, and proceeded with approximately 11 km from the front of the Dongam Station located in the Dongam Station in Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon at around 06:35 on the same day from the front of the Dongam Station located in 10, the Dongam-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, to the front of the road.

B. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from DMF) is a person engaging in driving a DMW car.

On July 17, 2016, at around 06:35, the Defendant proceeded at a speed of about 50km from the Incheon Port to the speed of about 50km, depending on the first lane for the first parallel road in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, Incheon.

In such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to take care of the situation of the front and left and right and right and right and to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, as described in Paragraph 1, the Defendant neglected to drive in the front of the vehicle in a situation where it is difficult for the Defendant to drive the vehicle in a normal condition due to drinking, and due to negligence that led to the failure of the victim B (the age of 32) who was stopped under the new subparagraph in front of the Defendant’s vehicle, received a rear-off spread of the E-Adi vehicle in front of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence as above.

2. Defendant B: (a) around July 17, 2016, around 06:15.

arrow