logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2012.08.31 2012고합278
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

1,000,000 square meters (No. 1), 1,000,000 square meters (No. 2,000).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 4, 1975, the Defendant sentenced the Seoul Northern District Court to a maximum of one year, a short of eight months, and a long-term of eight years, a short-term eight months, a prison term of imprisonment with prison labor for night intrusion larceny; on January 19, 1978, two years of the suspended execution of eight months; on July 3, 1978, one year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul Northern District Court at the Seoul Northern District Court at the Seoul Northern District Court at the Seoul Northern District Court at the Seoul Northern District Court at the Seoul Northern District Court at the Seoul Northern District Court at the Seoul Northern District Court at the Seoul Northern District Court at the same time on April 18, 1979; on September 6, 1980, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Seoul Northern District Court at the Seoul Northern District Court at the Seoul Northern District Court at the same time at the Seoul Northern District Court at the Seoul Northern District Court at the same time at the Seoul Northern District Court at the same time on March 6, 19, 196 years, respectively.

Criminal facts

"2012 Gohap278"

1. The criminal defendant was released from prison prison prison by the victim C, who was aware of during the prison prison prison life, thereby deceiving the victim's property and punishing him/her for his/her living expenses. The criminal defendant deceivings the victim and received property twice as follows.

At around 14:00 on February 14, 2012, the Defendant stated that “E” coffee shop of the second floor located in Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City Do, “The Defendant may bring the erogate in China and make a big profit to sell it in Korea, but the purchase cost of erocon is required.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to purchase the erogate.

As above, the Defendant received 3 million won in cash from the victim on the same day on the same day.

B. On February 15, 2012, the Defendant displayed and finished a paper bags packed to the victim at the coffee shop.

arrow