logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2012.08.10 2012고정270
건축사법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 7,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

D The owner of “F kindergarten” completed on December 31, 2010 after he/she was changed from a facility for older persons and children to a kindergarten which is an educational facility on June 25, 2009, and Defendant A was in charge of planning and supervising the construction of a kindergarten, which is a new building from the above owner D on April 2010, and Defendant B leased the above owner’s name to the above owner of the building.

1. Defendant A

A. Despite the fact that the Defendant was not an architect, around early April 2010, at around 09:00, the Defendant entered into a contract for the design and construction supervision of the said new building of the said kindergarten from D, the owner of the building, to April 31, 2010, for the design and construction supervision of the said building, the Defendant, who was not an architect, was not an architect, and designed for the construction of the building by means of design and construction supervision of the said building.

B. 1) On November 24, 2010, when applying an application for permission to change the use of a building to a building for a disabled kindergarten in violation of the Building Act, a toilet available for persons with disabilities, etc. shall be installed in a passage accessible to persons with disabilities, etc., and the designer shall be designed so that the installation and structure of the building equipment can conform to the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes. Nevertheless, on November 24, 2010, when the Defendant filed an application for permission to change the use of a building with respect to the same Gu F kindergarten located in the north-gu Office at the center of North-gu, 325 Si/Gu, North-gu, North-gu, 2010, the Defendant installed a toilet for persons with disabilities in violation of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, which was installed in a room other than a passage, and revised the building design in violation of the Building Act, etc.; 2) The project supervisor completed the construction

Nevertheless, ..

arrow