A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

10,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Of the facts charged in the instant case.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence) and accusation around March 10, 200 through around 15, 209;

A. On November 26, 1993, the Defendant was punished by a fine of 1 million won for habitual gambling at the Seoul Southern District Court of Seoul, the Seoul Southern District Court of the Republic of Korea on September 12, 1997; imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months; a suspended sentence of 2 years; fine of 7 million won for habitual gambling at the Seoul Southern District Court of the Seoul Southern District Court of the Republic of Korea on February 25, 199; imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months (actual punishment) for habitual gambling; imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months for perjury and habitual gambling by the Suwon District Court of the Seoul Northern District Court of the Seoul Northern District on November 2, 200; imprisonment with prison labor for 204 for 8 months (actual punishment); a person who had been engaged in gambling with K in gambling from around September 2, 201; and a person who has been engaged in gambling business with K on February 25, 199.

On the other hand, L, at around May 18, 2008, was detained by the Busan District Public Prosecutor's Office as gambling opened and scambling, etc. and was under investigation or trial at the Incheon District Public Prosecutor's Office, made a statement to the effect that M, who did not have any relationship with L at the time, had "be suspected of handling L's narcotics" at the above Busan District Public Prosecutor's Office of the same month, and that J did not have any other person by means of the scambling method, and was under an additional investigation due to the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence) by informing the fact that J dealt with narcotics, he was under suspicion of the credibility of his statement by informing the investigation agency that he dealt with the narcotics, thereby going against his suspicion, and tried to detain him who actively made a statement at a disadvantage to his investigation agency.

Therefore L was released upon the ruling of permission for release on bail in the support of the Incheon District Prosecutors' Office around August 26, 2008 after obtaining the ruling of permission for release on bail. On September 2, 2008, L requested the defendant who was in a pro rata relationship with J to inform him of the fact that J is dealing with the narcotics. On September 5, 2008, the defendant requested the Seoul Guro Police Station to inform him of the fact that J is dealing with the narcotics.