A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On December 1, 2006, the defendant was sentenced to a fine of 3 million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Suwon District Court on May 23, 2008, and a fine of 2.5 million won due to the same crime, etc. at the same court on May 23, 2008. On November 18, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for 6 months with imprisonment for the same crime.

【Criminal Facts】

"2014 Highest 1661"

1. On March 15, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license), and the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Motor Vehicle Accident Compensation Act”), operated a B-type cargo vehicle not covered by the automobile insurance without a vehicle driver’s license, in a section of about 500 meters, while under the influence of alcohol of about 0.171% at a distance of about 50 meters from the implied road near the convenience of the wife population at Chicago-si to the front of a neighboring C-cafeteria.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving B cargo vehicles.

At around 13:50 on March 15, 2014, the Defendant was driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol of 0.171% under the influence of alcohol without a driver’s license, on the front of the C cafeteria located in Young-si, the wife population D.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to safely drive a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle by driving the motor vehicle with the view of front and rear left and properly operating the steering gear and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol without a driver’s license, omitted the statement of the victim E in the indictment owned by the victim E, which is parked in the future. However, this appears to be simple omission. According to each evidence of the judgment, the above E-car is owned by E, and E is obviously a victim, and such correction is made ex officio without any changes in the indictment.

FE-car was received from the FE-car.

Ultimately, the defendant's above occupational negligence to repair the car 3,302.