1. The plaintiff's primary claim and the conjunctive claim are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 16, 2004, the Plaintiff (BB and male) entered the Navy and was discharged from military service on January 31, 2010.

B. On June 23, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant on June 18, 2008, based on the following grounds: “The Plaintiff incurred the difference between the Plaintiff and the Defendant: (a) the fact that the Plaintiff had engaged in crowdfunding among combat sports (scambling) and fell into the ground from head to the ground (hereinafter “accident”); and (b) the fact that the Plaintiff was suffering from the injury of the protruding signboard escape certificate (C5-6); and (c) the fact that the protruding escape certificate (L4-5) of the protruding signboard escape certificate (L4-5)” (hereinafter “the instant difference”).

On November 1, 2017, the defendant confirmed that "generally inferred signboard escape certificate to the plaintiff on November 1, 2017, except in cases where there is a special external trauma due to the characteristics of the military register and it is possible to generate spine ebrates, and that ebrates disease occurs in the core of the inside of the conical signboard due to the accumulation of stress on spine ebrates during daily life. Thus, it is difficult to recognize that the applicant's disease has aggravated its medical opinion, such as external stress ebrates, annual organization damage, side form, and non-annual expenditure, etc., which can recognize that the symptoms of the conical signboard escape occurred rapidly. According to the results of the video trial reading of the specialist of the Veterans Examination Council at the time of the Veterans Examination Council at the time of the 255th Veterans Council on 2017, since it is difficult to recognize that the applicant's disease has a chronic symptoms opinion, not soft, and thus, it is difficult to recognize that it has aggravated its medical impact due to public duty.

It is not clear that there is no change in circumstances to reverse the contents of deliberation and resolution in relation to the application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State in 2010 and 2015.