logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.08.10 2017고단696
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] The Defendant received a summary order of a fine of KRW 5 million on September 4, 2014 from the Seoul Southern District Court for the same crime, respectively, as a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) in support for the development of the place of guard and guard, etc. on August 26, 2015.

[Criminal facts] The defendant is a person who operates a marina business with the trade name, "D marina paper" from the 3rd floor of the Manan-gu Mayang-gu.

From January 2017 to March 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received KRW 100,000 per male customer at the same place from around January 2017 to March 9, 2017, and paid KRW 100,00 per day to female employees; and (b) hired female employees E, etc., and had female employees take the sexual organ of male customers as his/her hand and scam, thereby engaging in commercial sex acts, such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing Mazine photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, and selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act had already been punished for the same kind of crime, the punishment for the crime of this case is not less complicated in light of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case again.

However, it is decided as ordered in full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the fact that the defendant is against the defendant, the fact that there is no history of punishment exceeding the fine, and the age and environment of the defendant.

arrow