logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.08.10 2017고단793
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, each of the defendants B.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant A was punished at the Incheon District Court on January 13, 2016 for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts such as Arranging Commercial Sex Acts (mediation, etc. of commercial sex acts), for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts such as Arranging Commercial Sex Acts, etc. on October 21, 2015, a fine of three million won for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts such as Arranging Commercial Sex Acts (mediation, etc. of commercial sex acts), on December 30, 2009, by a fine of three million won for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts such as Arranging Commercial Acts (mediation, etc. of commercial sex acts), and on September 20, 2007, by a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts such as Arranging Commercial Sex Acts, etc. on September 20, 2007.

Defendant

On June 14, 2017, A was sentenced to 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor and one year of suspended execution in Busan District Court, which became final and conclusive on June 22, 2017.

[2] Defendant A is a business owner who operates a G massage treatment establishment on the 6th floor of the building located in the Mayang-gu F and the 7th floor of the Mayang-gu, and Defendant B is an employee who instructs male customers and female employees to room and settle the harmony at the above massage treatment establishment.

Defendant

A From the beginning of November 2015 to the beginning of September 2016, and from February 14, 2016 to August 11, 2016, Defendant B received KRW 18-200,000 for each male customer in the place of the massage treatment from February 14, 2016 to August 11, 2016, the said place of the massage treatment had disabled persons under his/her name-oriented perspective know-how and let female employees do sexual intercourse, thereby having them do sexual intercourse.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as commercial sex acts such as brokerage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A suspect examination protocol against Defendant A (including the part concerning the statement made by Defendant B)

1. Data on sales of the person under consideration and the details of use;

1. A detailed statement of transactions in passbook;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs of massage parlors;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 19 of the said Act and the Criminal Act.

arrow