A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 3226"

1. On March 18, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, where he/she paid approximately KRW 110,000,00 as the result of winning the rental housing at the Suwon-dong Community Service Center located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which was 382, a 382-hon 24,00, to the extent that he/she did not pose a key to the housing.

In this regard, two harmonys were set by large sound, and the public official C, etc. belonging to the above community service center had worked as a public official, etc. to the above community service center.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning civil petitions by public officials.

2. The Defendant committed assault, on the date and time set forth in paragraph 1, and at a place set forth in paragraph 1, the victim D (61) who is a safety personnel to restrain the Defendant from spreading along the Defendant, attempted to keep the Defendant from leaving the Defendant in mind by committing assaulting the victim D, and harming the victim D on the floor by pushing the victim D.

"2016 Highest 4130"

3. On June 27, 2016, the Defendant was urged to recover the basic livelihood benefits paid to the previous Defendant even though he/she did not report the fact, and was selected as an illegal recipient, even though he/she had earned income at the fourth social welfare department and office of the 4th floor in the Yanwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 101, the 13:30 on June 27, 2016, and he/she was called for a string of the wind that he/she was in the above office.

“Hambing off” and cutting up stones that have been prepared in advance and put in a bank.

In addition, public officials, such as E, who are public officials belonging to the above Gu office, were collected in F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning civil petition counseling by public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of each statute of the D and F Statements;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;