A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

C and D were prosecuted for perjury with the Busan District Court on December 27, 2017 and tried as the High Court 2017 order 6351 of the above court. The summary of the facts charged was falsely testified to the effect that F had no such fact, at the conference room of the apartment management office around November 11, 2016, in the fact that F had been satisfing about G’s breath.

“” is:

Defendant was a person who resides in an apartment building such as the above C and D, and was for the above C and D, and the Defendants did not prove that the F had no f had engaged in fat at the time in G, and thus did not constitute perjury.

Doing to the purport that it is “......”

Accordingly, on April 9, 2018, the Defendant was present at the Busan District Court 253, the Busan District Court 31, the Busan District Court 253, the Busan District Court 2017 order 6351 order 6351 order 201 order 6351 order 201 order 2000 order 2000 order 15:5 order 2000 order 2000 order 2001 order 2000 Gab, 2007.

“I have no time to ask questions”.

In the case of the dispute, the body is faced with this kind of body, and it was never done.

The answer is that “the witness” of the prosecutor continued to show that the F and G are close to each other, and that the witness left the meeting of the management office as well as the place where they move out of the meeting room of the management office.

“To answer the question,”

B. It has been in the same way.

The answer to "," and it is required that "the witness had all the days between the two, and whether F did not have a face of flapsing of G.

“I do not have any example to the question “.....”

I want that we will see the Marocco.

“The answer was made.”

However, in fact, around 19:00 on February 29, 2016, F used a fat at the meeting room of the management office of E apartment complex 1, E apartment complex, and even if the above C and D showed all of them, it was proved in the court of the case of injury to F, and the defendant is also aware of all the circumstances at the time.