A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around June 7, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C, stating, “The victim is an internal foreign exchange and futures trading expert, who will receive KRW 100,000,000,000,00 per month, by making exchange gains transaction at the face of KRW 100,000.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was unable to make a fixed profit by suffering a large loss in foreign exchange futures trading, and there was a need to pay the agreed amount by fraud from other investors, and there was no intention or ability to guarantee fixed profit and return the money received from the victims even if they did not have any property.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 50 million from the victim to the new bank account in the name of D by his identity on the same day.

around June 24, 2011, the Defendant received, in the same manner, KRW 120 million from the bank account in the above D’s name, KRW 30 million from June 27, 201, KRW 80 million from July 13, 201, and KRW 20 million from July 15, 201, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property amounting to KRW 300 million by deceiving the victim.

2. On June 201, the Defendant indicated “C” in the written indictment of the Victim E at a place where he/she was unaware of a place not in Seoul (hereinafter referred to as Seoul) around Seoul (hereinafter referred to as “E”) as “E” because it is apparent that the victim is another person from

A false statement was made to the effect that “I would like to make profits of KRW 300,000,000 per month by making exchange marginal profits transactions of KRW 100,000 per week as an expert in domestic futures trading.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was unable to make a fixed profit by suffering a large loss in foreign exchange futures trading, and there was a need to pay the agreed amount by fraud from other investors, and there was no intention or ability to guarantee fixed profit and return the money received from the victims even if they did not have any property.

The Defendant is identical to this.