Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

around 03:15 on July 9, 2014, the Defendant’s outline of “C” in Gumi-si B.

In front of the main point, the issue of the business owner and the drinking value payment of the above main point is being disputed from E belonging to the police station of the old US police station, which was called upon 112 report, and called “E”, “E is the tax to be paid by the police, n.e. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning police officers' patrol and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to F and E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In addition to the background, mode, etc. of the crime for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, a written agreement is submitted that E does not want the punishment against the defendant after the prosecution, considering the fact that there is no criminal record of the same kind or suspended execution, circumstances favorable to the reflection, and other circumstances, including the defendant's age, character, conduct, environment, etc., the sentence is determined as ordered.