Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for four months, respectively.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of the Daegu Suwon-gu C building and the "E Gameland" in subparagraph D, and Defendant B is the employee of the above game site.

No one shall engage in activities such as exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase of tangible or intangible results through the use of game products.

From May 30, 2019 to July 11, 2019, the Defendants established 40 game machine such as 20 game machine in the above game room, and 20 game machine, and offered them for use by customers, and if customers request to exchange points obtained through the above game machine, they paid in cash equivalent to 10% of commission.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exchange the results obtained by using game products with customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement concerning the F;

1. Seizure records;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Report on the computation of a B additional collection charge);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and the Defendants’ choice of punishment: Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A of a community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 44 (2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act;

1. Defendant B: The crime of this case committed by the Defendant A with the reason of sentencing under Articles 10(1) and 8(1) of the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment is that the Defendant in collusion with B in the operation of the game site as the owner of the business, and thus, conducts money exchange business of the result of using the game products. The crime of this case is very important, and the fact that the Defendant has the same kind and same criminal records is considered as the cause of sentencing, and is considered as the cause of sentencing favorable to the confession of the crime, and is committed by the Defendant.