A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. 피해자 K에 대한 상해 피고인은 2012. 11. 25. 21:40경 창원시 마산회원구 L에 있는 피해자 K(53세) 운영의 M노래연습장에서 노래를 부르다가 피해자로부터 나가달라는 말을 듣자 화가 나 탁자를 뒤엎고 소란을 피우다가 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴을 수회 때리고, 발로 피해자의 얼굴 등을 수회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the defendant was unable to know the number of days of treatment to the victim.

2. The Defendant: (a) expressed that “Chewing franchise will be the same,” who was demanded voluntary franchise, who had arrived at the scene upon receiving a report at the time and place specified in paragraph (1); and (b) expressed his/her face as drinking.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties related to N's investigation duties, and at the same time, did not know the number of days of treatment to the above N.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to K and N;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (the second crimes of injury at the time of the sale, the crimes of obstruction of the performance of official duties, and the punishment imposed on the crimes of injury which are heavier than that of the said crimes).

3. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

4. From among concurrent crimes, there is no good character of the crime by causing injury to a police officer dispatched after receiving a report, etc., the degree of violence inflicted on a police officer is also not easy. The defendant has a history of punishment for the same kind of crime in the past, it reaches a majority of criminal records related to violence, establishment of a state's legal order and eradication of the public power.