logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원진주지원 2020.08.13 2020고단452
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 16, 2020, the Defendant, upon receiving a report from the head of the Gyeongcheon-si Police Station D District, Gyeongcheon-gu, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-do,

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Poly-camp CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (investigation into the situation at the time of withdrawal);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act in regard to probation, community service or lecture attendance order;

1. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of type] the obstruction of performance of official duties [Type 1]/ the obstruction of performance of official duties [the scope of recommendation field and recommendation range] there is no person subject to the coercion of official duties] (the scope of recommendation field and recommendation range] basic area, six months to one year and six months;

2. The punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the records of violence committed to police officers who suffered damage to the sentence, the developments leading up to the dispatch of the damaged police officers to the scene, the records of the defendant's previous punishment records, and various conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments of this case;

arrow