The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 31, 2004, the Plaintiff joined a stock company B (hereinafter “instant business establishment”) and served as the source of digging skills and the air space in the mountain of the mountain of the mountain of the mountain of the mountain of the mountain.

On November 4, 2016, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by “the certificate of a senior secretary in charge of the left-hand side” (hereinafter “the certificate of a senior secretary in charge of the left-hand side”) and was approved by the Defendant for medical care for the said wounded soldier.

B. Since then, the Plaintiff obtained additional medical care from the Defendant against the Defendant’s injury and disease “Eargue-gun in charge of the outer side and the left-hand side,” and applied for additional injury and disease to the Defendant on June 26, 2019 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant injury and disease”), where the Plaintiff received additional medical care from the Defendant for the said injury and disease (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the instant injury and disease”), (i) around 5-6 inverte-6 in the vertebron chrone in the verteculs between the 6-7 in the vertebrons:

(c)

Accordingly, on July 3, 2019, the Defendant decided not to accept the Plaintiff’s additional injury and disease application for each of the instant injury and disease based on the Defendant’s advisory opinion (hereinafter “the instant disposition”). The Defendant decided not to accept the Plaintiff’s additional injury and disease application for each of the instant injury and disease, based on the Defendant’s opinion that “The degree of the instant disposition was observed along with the climatic change, but the degree was not a military register that pressures the climatic root or the number of times, but it appears not to be a part of the climatic change due to age increase.”

(d)

The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for review and reexamination to the Defendant, but all of the requests for review and reexamination were dismissed.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. Each of the instant injuries asserted by the Plaintiff is found as a new or aggravated disease caused by an occupational accident.