1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 29, 2014, the Plaintiff, as an employee of the KTW branch, parked a vehicle for business use on the part of the Plaintiff, and applied for medical care to the Defendant on July 7, 2014, after receiving the diagnosis of “the escape certificate of a conical signboard between Articles 5-6 and 6-7, and the escape certificate of a conical signboard for 4-5,” where other vehicles are faced with an accident, such as protruding the front seat with the Plaintiff’s vehicle and protruding the even part of the driver’s seat (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. On August 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) acknowledged the escape certificate of a conical signboard between the 5-6 and 6-7, and the escape certificate of a conical signboard between the 4-5 and the 4-5 protruding disease; (b) it is reasonable to approve the change to the conical and conical base; and (c) approved the escape certificate of a conical signboard between the 5-6 and 6-7 and the 4-5-5, on the ground that “It is reasonable to approve the change to the conical and conical base”; and (d) approved the change to the medical care injury and injury injury.

C. On December 11, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a request for examination. On December 11, 2014, the Defendant changed the “porizontal escape certificate” among the injury and disease without approval to the approval disposition, and dismissed the remainder of the non-approval injury and disease.

After that, the Plaintiff filed a petition for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but the petition for reexamination was dismissed on April 24, 2015.

(hereinafter) As to the final non-approval of the injury and disease of this case, the "scopic signboard escape certificate between the 6-7 trend and the conical signboard escape certificate between the 4-5 trend" shall be "the injury and disease of this case," and only the non-approval disposition against the injury and disease of this case shall be referred to as "the disposition of this case"). 【In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 11 (including the number of pages), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant injury occurred due to the instant accident or the existing disease occurred due to the instant accident.