Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant operates a certified judicial scrivener office in the Dong-gu in Gwangju-gu, and operates unregistered credit business in the way of lending a field to persons requesting real estate registration business, etc. and receiving high interest.

On July 16, 2010, the Defendant, without registering credit business, lent interest of KRW 5 million to E at the above certified judicial scrivener office at E on July 16, 201, and received KRW 438,500,000 as the principal and interest of the above loan at E on that day, on the condition of the loan period of KRW 1,350,000,000,000 from E on that day.

In addition, the Defendant loaned KRW 1,119,165,00 over four occasions, such as the attached list of crimes, and received interest from KRW 356.6% to KRW 420.9%, such as the list of crimes Nos. 1, 2, and 4.

Accordingly, the defendant operated a unregistered credit business and received interest in violation of the statutory limit interest rate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the details of transactions of bankbooks, certificates of deposit without passbooks, details of transactions submitted by suspects, and Acts and subordinate statutes calculating interest rates;

1. Relevant Article of facts constituting an offense, Article 19 (1) 1, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Finance Users, Articles 19 (2) 3 and 11 (1) of the same Act, and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Code for the detention of the workhouses is that the defendant engaged in illegal credit business by receiving interest from the debtor who runs an unregistered credit business and at least 356.6% or 420.9% of the year exceeding the limit prescribed by the relevant law, it is deemed that a strict punishment is necessary, but the defendant is divided into and against his mistake, and the defendant has no criminal record.