logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.12.12 2014고합350
특수공무집행방해치상
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 16:00 on June 2, 2014, the Defendant was found to operate a bond F car without a safety level to D and E, on the bottom of the C-F car in the New, Southern-gun, Daejeon-gun, the lower court, on the ground that it was discovered that the Defendant operated a bond F car without a safety mark to D and E, while conducting inspection, search, and traffic control.

The Defendant stated that “I believe I would not believe I would like to believe I or the magazine? I or she would like to see I or the magazine? I or she would like to make it impossible for D to verify the Defendant’s identity immediately after I or she am informed of D’s face, and that I or she continued to request D’s presentation of the driver’s license.”

B. Darada Doz.

“In doing so, I tried to set the front door to the front door. D will bring the end of the driver’s and the window of the driver’s seat in order to prevent the Defendant from departing, and E will bring the end of the window of the car after D.

In spite of the phrase "the defendant's attempt to call a car, which is a dangerous object with D at a rapid rate, caused D to go beyond D's floor, while continuing to be equipped with the window of the driver's seat of the car, E's body is faced with the car at a rapid rate, and D caused D's damage to the sprink, which requires D's treatment for about two weeks, and caused D's damage to the sprinkability of the following arms requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on criminal investigation, and thereby suffered injury to police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each photographic, diagnostic, and opinion;

1. Articles 144 (2) and (1), and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes are prescribed.

arrow