1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on April 16, 2017, as a foreigner of the nationality of the People’s Republic of China (People’s Republic of China, hereinafter “China”), with the status of stay C-3 (short-term visit).

B. On April 17, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on May 10, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “the well-founded fear of persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. On June 13, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground on March 21, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. On May 2005, the Plaintiff asserted that he started training of the patriarche with the introduction of B, a taxi driver.

On June 2016, the Plaintiff was arrested from the public design while serving as a public forum, and was investigated for more than one month, and was able to unfold a fine of 7,000 bills.

Then, it is difficult to investigate whether the official design has been found as a house at intervals of 3 to 5 days and whether the plaintiff continues to conduct the training of the Rose of Sharon handled by the plaintiff.

If the plaintiff returns to his own country, it is likely to threaten the life or physical freedom of the Chinese government on the ground of the training of the patriarche.

Nevertheless, the disposition of this case which rejected the Plaintiff’s application for refugee status should be revoked as it is unlawful.

B. Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act is determined.