logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.03.21 2018구단74795
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on March 28, 2017, as a foreigner of the nationality of the People’s Republic of China (People’s Republic of China, hereinafter “China”), with the status of stay C-3 (short-term visit).

B. On May 10, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on May 26, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “the well-founded fear of persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. On July 17, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as on September 3, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted that he was aware of the patriarche through B, who was known to the Plaintiff while working, and that he started training of the patriarche from around 201.

Since 2012, the Plaintiff was engaged in the distribution of books related to the Rose of Sharon from the two months to the two months.

On September 2016, the Plaintiff was arrested in the factory and detained for about one month, while training the patriarche in the house. However, the Plaintiff was able to write down a fine of 5,000s.

The Chinese government is strongly suppressing the pathic womb, and when the plaintiff returns to his own country, it is likely to threaten the life or physical freedom of the Chinese government on the ground of the training of the pathic Rose.

Nevertheless, the disposition of this case which rejected the Plaintiff’s application for refugee status.

arrow